When I access a FoxPro table directly using the following URL, the performance is great, and even faster than my current ODBC solution:
jdbc:dbf:///c:/data/
However, I need to traverse a firewall in a manner other than using file sharing, so I hope to use your server component. Testing locally, however, my URL is:
jdbc:dbf://localhost:3099/c:/data/
I find that the server component is slower in performance by a factor of 6x at times. Is the serialization of the result set causing the slowness? Is there anything I can do to go faster? What is your own experience with direct access to the file versus using the server component?
I wish it were a network problem, but everything is running on my machine during my testing.
Thank you,
Steve
|
|
Is there any advice on this?
|
>Is the serialization of the result set causing the slowness?
Yeah. Changed some serialization code in the latest pakcage according to your request, but it seems speed hasn't quicken too much. Please download the latest package.
>Is there anything I can do to go faster?
Statement.setFechSize
>What is your own experience with direct access to the file versus
>using the server component?
Embedded mode is quicker than client/server mode. According to project requirement, sometimes you have to choose client/server mode.
|
Main
webmaster@hxtt.com